tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post5730569530415927220..comments2024-03-11T12:50:02.036+01:00Comments on PyPy Status Blog: PyPy 5.0 releasedCarl Friedrich Bolz-Tereickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00518922641059511014noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-9940863977872643422016-03-20T12:10:19.065+01:002016-03-20T12:10:19.065+01:00Before trying out lxml 3.6.0, upgrade to PyPy 5.0....Before trying out lxml 3.6.0, upgrade to PyPy 5.0.1: the release 5.0.0 does not reliably work with it.Armin Rigohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06300515270104686574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-69057342474318116872016-03-17T16:07:20.654+01:002016-03-17T16:07:20.654+01:00lxml 3.6.0 released with support for PyPy 5.x.lxml 3.6.0 released with support for PyPy 5.x.Armin Rigohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06300515270104686574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-12163728013516082762016-03-14T04:52:13.739+01:002016-03-14T04:52:13.739+01:00When is release of pypy3 5.0?
I'd like also to...When is release of pypy3 5.0?<br />I'd like also to get the profit of pypy5.0 by a condition of support of python 3.2.5.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11023508867598634219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-28242826747560340372016-03-11T13:40:36.607+01:002016-03-11T13:40:36.607+01:00Paul Melis, Maciej Fjalkowski - indeed there was a...Paul Melis, Maciej Fjalkowski - indeed there was a bug; I reran the old benchmarks but only ~half ran to completion. I reverted the bad run, now results are like they used to be. Thanks for pointing it outmattiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07336549270776418081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-19946876355535508212016-03-11T12:07:28.086+01:002016-03-11T12:07:28.086+01:00Great news! Awesome!Great news! Awesome!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08715629585049149233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-82839775081891719232016-03-11T11:56:40.375+01:002016-03-11T11:56:40.375+01:00Hi Paul.
We rerun all benchmarks on old Pythons a...Hi Paul.<br /><br />We rerun all benchmarks on old Pythons and it shows now a different subset of benchmarks. I must admit I don't know why the main site chooses some benchmarks and not others, it's certainly not deliberate. Any single number you use is not correct, a bit by definition - we suggest you look in details what the benchmarks do or even better, benchmark yourself. We'll look why it's showing a different subsetMaciej Fijalkowskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11410841070239382771noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-8521491490584242392016-03-11T11:52:16.389+01:002016-03-11T11:52:16.389+01:00What happened to the speed graph on speed.pypy.org...What happened to the speed graph on speed.pypy.org? The speedups for earlier versions of PyPy before 5.0 suddenly are much higher than they used to be. Compare for example against the graph of a couple of weeks ago (http://web.archive.org/web/20160228102615/http://speed.pypy.org/)<br /><br />Version 28/2 11/3<br />1.5 3.18x 4.86x<br />2.1 6.12x 7.50x<br />2.4.0 6.22x 7.61x<br />2.6.1 7.05x 8.58x<br /><br />Has the benchmark been changed, the timing method, the speed computation, hardware used, etc? More importantly, which version is "correct"?<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16511921746840435945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-50293911017099700542016-03-11T09:57:54.577+01:002016-03-11T09:57:54.577+01:00I've asked Brett Cannon, well-know Pythonista ...I've asked Brett Cannon, well-know Pythonista working at Microsoft about whether they could sponsor or undertake Windows 64-bit work. <br /><br />If you have a substantial use cause requiring the speed of PyPy, large address spaces and Windows, it might help.Martin Gfellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04487011018225699773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-61166569645359563732016-03-11T09:09:13.152+01:002016-03-11T09:09:13.152+01:00mathgl: yes, we are cautiously optimistic that if ...mathgl: yes, we are cautiously optimistic that if we now flesh out cpyext to support enough of the C-API that vanilla numpy might just work. Stay tuned for further developmentsmattiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07336549270776418081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-53900111818050834632016-03-11T09:06:02.895+01:002016-03-11T09:06:02.895+01:00HelpingHand: work on x64 for windows [0] is awaiti...HelpingHand: work on x64 for windows [0] is awaiting a champion, with either the skill to do it or with the deep pockets to sponsor it. If you are interested, please come to #pypy on IRC to discuss it<br /><br />[0] http://doc.pypy.org/en/latest/windows.html#what-is-missing-for-a-full-64-bit-translationmattiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07336549270776418081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-85393583531703479652016-03-11T06:05:29.872+01:002016-03-11T06:05:29.872+01:00does new cpyext help for supporting numpy?does new cpyext help for supporting numpy?mathglhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11093075569963354210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-76600163628822191542016-03-10T23:30:04.367+01:002016-03-10T23:30:04.367+01:00What is the status on finally getting a functional...What is the status on finally getting a functional x64 build for windows? I am mainly interested in embedding PyPy and unless there is support for it, I will continue to avoid it.<br />HelpingHandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11102987449932313263noreply@blogger.com