tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post559424594592497545..comments2024-03-11T12:50:02.036+01:00Comments on PyPy Status Blog: PyPy 1.6 - kickass pandaCarl Friedrich Bolz-Tereickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00518922641059511014noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-19025011140349969592011-08-24T12:16:32.153+02:002011-08-24T12:16:32.153+02:00just impressive. If you guys could resurrect the n...just impressive. If you guys could resurrect the numpy operation like:<br /><br />boolean_array = arr > value<br /><br />it would be just a dream. This important operation returns not an array, but a value now.vakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13157594553222689990noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-27543929655893212232011-08-23T13:48:29.343+02:002011-08-23T13:48:29.343+02:00I believe you got to compile it yourself.I believe you got to compile it yourself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-86720434075984274572011-08-23T10:45:02.050+02:002011-08-23T10:45:02.050+02:00Ok, but where to download PYPY for Win32 ?Ok, but where to download PYPY for Win32 ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-60915443566735592772011-08-22T19:25:32.577+02:002011-08-22T19:25:32.577+02:00Pypy does support Windows 32bit, with a couple of ...Pypy does support Windows 32bit, with a couple of bugs, the windows support have been improved from 1.5 to 1.6. Perhaps it will be fully working by 1.7.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-59239794076149338102011-08-22T11:56:58.552+02:002011-08-22T11:56:58.552+02:00But man! What's wrong with Windows?
Will the...But man! What's wrong with Windows?<br /><br />Will the windows version will be dropped?<br /><br />Version 1.5 does not fully work on Windows and now you release 1.6 you does not provide a windows version...<br /><br />So, I really want to know if it will be future support for windows.<br /><br />This will help to decide if pypy will be an option or one just have to find other options to speed up the programs.<br /><br />Please, clarify this.<br /><br />Bests,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-2510706072339628532011-08-21T15:54:35.736+02:002011-08-21T15:54:35.736+02:00Is there a 32-bit OSX version somewhere? 64-bit se...Is there a 32-bit OSX version somewhere? 64-bit seems to eat up memory in my tests...<br />Impressive stuff, though :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-31887593196751193582011-08-20T02:05:54.221+02:002011-08-20T02:05:54.221+02:00I'm still most looking forward to the day your...I'm still most looking forward to the day your jit makes some .pyj files. Initialization time for the jit is a bit high, especially if you use pypy integrated into other scripts where the init time might impact performance, numpy had no dtypes, and laked almost every function, but atleast it's a step in the right direction :)<br /><br />Memory usage for one of my own test apps (building a one dimensional dict with int keys, and object (sometimes by reference from a second dict) resulted in 76MB to python2.7 and 108MB to pypy 1.6. So memory usage is still a bit behind tho (the pypy runtime was better with around 35% tho).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-86060312575413160142011-08-19T22:24:47.016+02:002011-08-19T22:24:47.016+02:00PyPy 1.5: 68 seconds
PyPy 1.6: 65 seconds
Python 3...PyPy 1.5: 68 seconds<br />PyPy 1.6: 65 seconds<br />Python 3.2 (Intel C compiler): 36 seconds<br /><br />Extrapolation to the future:<br />PyPy 1.17: 35 seconds ?<br /><br />Jokes aside, PyPy's compatibility with CPython is good.Jan Ziak (atomsymbol)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00398184141815003668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-50146679581549663802011-08-19T19:28:15.902+02:002011-08-19T19:28:15.902+02:00Amazing - PyPy just keeps making leaps and bounds ...Amazing - PyPy just keeps making leaps and bounds forward for compat. and processing performance. I don't know how you guys keep up such pace, but I dig it!<br /><br />How is typical memory usage these days? It's been a while since anything was reported on its resource usage vs. CPython. Maybe such a benchmark could be added to the speed site?jensckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07915959975505647804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-63651859952995251952011-08-19T13:59:42.441+02:002011-08-19T13:59:42.441+02:00Congrats !!! Realy amazing job !!
By the way, wh...Congrats !!! Realy amazing job !! <br /><br />By the way, where can I find more informations about the alredy implemented numpy functions ?<br /><br />Thanks.Lenzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01926488610475493406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-359022197713857022011-08-19T09:34:32.545+02:002011-08-19T09:34:32.545+02:00What kind of problems prevent releasing a Windows ...What kind of problems prevent releasing a Windows 64bit version?Maciej Szumockihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16297493131533118162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-21386002567467150922011-08-19T08:55:03.294+02:002011-08-19T08:55:03.294+02:00Still can't build and run python-ldap extensio...Still can't build and run python-ldap extension... :(<br />That's a deal-breaker for me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-11614619803736526472011-08-19T08:36:50.140+02:002011-08-19T08:36:50.140+02:00I did some benchmark with some simple parameterize...I did some benchmark with some simple parameterized SELECT statements, and found that pg8000 on pypy 1.6 is more than one time slower than pg8000 on python 2.7.1, while the later is already more than one time slower than psycopg2 on python 2.7.1.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-55285276833280391572011-08-19T06:13:39.545+02:002011-08-19T06:13:39.545+02:00Where is the windows version?Where is the windows version?profuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11487767331947349399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-70834602896285136602011-08-19T04:37:25.754+02:002011-08-19T04:37:25.754+02:00Impressive as always. Thanks for releasing such gr...Impressive as always. Thanks for releasing such great software.<br />Keep up the good work.<br /><br />AnghelAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-80068448752350031502011-08-18T23:54:22.454+02:002011-08-18T23:54:22.454+02:00no.
"Unfortunately, this does not mean that ...no.<br /><br />"Unfortunately, this does not mean that you can expect to take an existing NumPy program and run it on PyPy"<br /><br />thanks for the release pypy team!almir karichttp://almirkaric.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-81444723393661152462011-08-18T22:58:57.483+02:002011-08-18T22:58:57.483+02:00"and has beta level support for loading CPyth..."and has beta level support for loading CPython C extensions"<br /><br />does this mean that the regular Numpy and Scipy can be used with this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-74622583988574280352011-08-18T22:15:08.346+02:002011-08-18T22:15:08.346+02:00I look forward to support Python 3I look forward to support Python 3Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-38484104359461374002011-08-18T20:01:01.543+02:002011-08-18T20:01:01.543+02:00Congrats team pypy!Congrats team pypy!René Dudfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17762358075557755436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-36594691816699002412011-08-18T19:59:50.234+02:002011-08-18T19:59:50.234+02:00Finally :) I'm really looking forward to test ...Finally :) I'm really looking forward to test this code out :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com