tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post2291955489972824511..comments2024-03-11T12:50:02.036+01:00Comments on PyPy Status Blog: Blog coverage of speed.pypy.orgCarl Friedrich Bolz-Tereickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00518922641059511014noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-60602248343252376532010-03-24T18:02:03.194+01:002010-03-24T18:02:03.194+01:00@Luis pidigits is about using gmpy for cpython vs ...@Luis pidigits is about using gmpy for cpython vs longs for pypy. It's a bit apples vs oranges. That said, CPython's longs are still faster than pypy's so we definitely can improve. This are needs some love :)<br /><br />Reverse complement is string benchmark and I did not look but it might be that the speed of str.translate is suboptimal.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />fijal, hidingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-8197072547804005212010-03-22T21:12:42.389+01:002010-03-22T21:12:42.389+01:00Question:
According to the Computer Language Benc...Question: <br />According to the Computer Language Benchmarks Game, there are three benchmarks that perform way slower in Pypy against Python 3 ( see here: http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=pypy&lang2=python3 ).<br /><br />Those are:<br />1) reverse-complement<br />2) regex-dna<br />3) pidgits<br /><br />I know that regex-dna performs slower because regex haven't been optimized yet, but what's the reason for the other two? Do they use regex too?Luishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01147433030878927988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3971202189709462152.post-66082206451116864762010-03-20T14:15:47.006+01:002010-03-20T14:15:47.006+01:00First of all congratulations for the great work, I...First of all congratulations for the great work, I can say I am a newbie in Python world but I follow with interest this project. I tryed the release with the JIT compiler with also the parallel python module and the speed gain is sensible. I compared also the performance with psyco on 3 or 4 benchmarks and it seems that the time for the execution is usually more or less the same. Do you think there will be the possibility again for a massive speed improvement in future releases or the level of max performance is not so far? How much faster could it be in the future?<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />PaoloPAOLO BASSOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14953751568458462675noreply@blogger.com